intelligence: but say q lo q schel described in cognitive perceptual learning is true if q and q explains part of our conducra, q pro says our behavior is even more cognitive perceptual learning sofisticada.el explains part d todo.schel not our pro aprendizje q says it is not necessary to present stimuli q q we develop the intelligence for inteligencia.la involves manipulating symbols is not necessary q q tngamos present and this is ace of frma sn abstracta.producto of this behavior science technology art etc.las philosophy poetry the most prominent definitions of intelligence are the first and most successful to qa been to a.binot and q explains the IQ of a person does not give the intelligence of a persona.yq is calculated by dividing mental age between the chronological age of each age x 100.a life uns ns corresponds solve problems. wilhelim david stern and Wechlerhave given a very similar definition q say intelligence or operational capability of a person's personal suitability to address new situations or to adapt to satifacoria so medio.cuando a person is presented with a new problem and the person responds in an operational way and cn fitness is considered adequate q is an intelligent person. factorials: for them the intelligence measure q s lo ls intelligence test, ie, the q emos psicometria test.la answered in intelligence is reflected in ls q test.ls q factors are observed in intelligence test sn ls numerals, verbal, spatial and reason.
controversy over intelligence: There are divergent views on intelligence, some scholars say that if it is possible intelligence in animals and others say it is unique to humans.
Those who think that intelligence is the ability to transform and modify the environment, nature and the ability to use tools are those who say that if it is possible intelligence in animals. While other intelligence is the ability to construct abstract concepts, making signs in symbols, learn the things that are real and articulate language construct are those who say that intelligence is exclusively human.
There are some scholars who say that animals always follow a pattern very flat behavior, ie, very simple, learning through a stimulus-response pattern. Humans also learn through stimulus-response pattern, but otherwise we give meaning to these stimuli, an interpretation, a meaning. We invent solutions for different scenarios and apply them to other scenarios, this is unique to humans and animals is something we can not do. We as biologists have a different cognitive intelligence of animals, say that humans are capable of interpreting through cognitive intelligence, we differentiate what is a prize and what a punishment, since we can interpret what we do, because what we do and how we do it.